Review: The Post

By Tammy Merrett

There is a well-known portrait of late Washington Post publisher Katherine Graham that
was created by legendary photographer Richard Avedon. In the portrait, created in 1976, Graham is standing with her arms folded, holding her glasses and the sleeves haphazardly rolled up on her simple shirtdress.

Graham has been described in the portrait as serious, stern and steadfast… a bit
intimidating. It is easy, if you’re a woman, to interpret those words as having a negative connotation in reference to a woman who can make decisions beyond what to make for dinner that night.

The Post has been in theaters for several weeks now, and Meryl Streep is up for another Oscar for her performance as Graham. Tom Hanks plays Post editor Ben Bradlee. The winners will be announced March 4.

There are several films about journalism and media practitioners out there, one of the most recent being Spotlight about the Boston Globe’s reporting on priest sexual abuse cases. Those of us who work in journalism all have our favorites, many choosing All The President’s Men dramatizing the reporting of the Watergate scandal that took down a president.

But The Post almost works as a prequel to the film about Woodward and Bernstein’s work. The report that became known as the Pentagon Papers was ordered during the Johnson administration by Sec. of Defense Robert McNamara, who was also a close friend and adviser of Katherine Graham’s. It revealed that, reaching back into the 1950s, the U.S. government had started to get involved in Vietnam and knew that our involvement would increase. By the time most U.S. citizens were aware we were committing resources and personnel, they were led to believe that it was to fight Communism when, at that time, it was to attempt to contain China, but even more so to save face. The U.S. couldn’t have a defeat.

That is revealed in a somewhat suspenseful way, which is no simple task when you’re dramatizing the real reporting process.

The Post helps put the point of view of the Nixon administration toward the press into perspective. He was paranoid and coming apart at the seams, but he was also very likely angry because of the scrutiny that he and his administration were getting while it seemed that the press in Washington and New York had not looked so critically at the Kennedys or LBJ. He wasn’t wrong.

For those watching the film who were not alive or old enough to remember the details of the time, you learn of the coziness that reporters had with those administrations, which were much more at fault for the decisions and motivations revealed in the report than Nixon was. Bradlee and Graham had socialized quite closely with the Kennedys. There is a point in the film where you see it possibly clicking for Bradlee that JFK was intentionally befriending him all along to cloud his judgment on covering the Kennedy administration.

This is a harsh reality that Graham also had to contend with that the film spends quite a bit of time working through. Graham was born into money and privilege. She dabbled in being a young reporter while her father owned the Washington Post, but gladly saw control of the company given to her husband, Phil Graham, when Eugene Meyer chose his son-in- law as his successor. There is a moving monologue in the film in which Graham talks about how that’s just how it was done and that all she ever wanted was to be a wife and mother and have the life and social standing she had become accustomed to – lots of garden parties with higher-ups in U.S. government and Washington, D.C. and New York society.

But when her husband committed suicide in 1963, it left Katherine with a company to run, and one that needed an infusion of cash to continue to grow. She decided to take it public, and the Pentagon Papers almost threw a serious wrench in the works of the initial public offering. We see Streep portray the constant siege that Graham must have felt she was under – having to keep up appearances with her social circles while finding that some of them were part of a huge lie on behalf of more than one presidential administration, feeling compelled to tell the public what was happening and having to fight the government to do it, struggling with these mammoth decisions while her family’s business that she never wanted to run could face financial ruin, and facing it all as a widow… a mother of four children… and as a woman.

While Katherine Graham was not always on the side of the little guy in running her business later on in life, she was known as a good boss to have if you were a reporter. And she became that while overcoming the biggest challenge women in business had at that time and more many more years on – she was a woman. What could she possibly know or contribute? She surely can’t make level-headed, financially sound decisions.

Streep’s expression of the turmoil Graham must have felt seemed true. There were misty eyes in the theater after her monologue, when she talked candidly to her daughter. She understood it. She knew how it felt to be a woman working twice as hard to be respected in her profession. She knew how it felt to be treated as if you didn’t belong. She knew how it felt to be an ant pushing a boulder up a hill, but doing it in heels and uncomfortable pantyhose. Streep portrays well that Graham didn’t ask for the job, but she did it well, possibly better than her father did or late husband would have.

And you see that in Graham’s face in the Avedon portrait. It’s easy to misinterpret her expression as stern, but for women who have quietly fought for respect in workplaces dominated by strong men, they can see it. Her sadness at what she had lost and what her country had lost in those years. They can see in her eyes her insecurity from a lifetime of being told she wasn’t valuable. They can see she is tired and apprehensive about what is around the corner.

But they can also see she is proud of the strength she found when she had to and would call on again when she needed it.

Tammy Merrett is a professor and newspaper adviser at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. She serves as vice president and treasurer of the St. Louis Society of Professional Journalists, and is a past president of St. Louis SPJ and the Illinois College Press Association.

Posted in government and media, media history | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

SPJ Night at the Movies Feb. 6

Of course you’ve heard of The Post, the Oscar-nominated film about the Washington Post and New York Times during the Pentagon Papers controversy. As we have done before, SPJ will descend on a local theater to watch the film, and then retire to a nearby pub to discuss it.

Please join us at the 7:10 p.m. showing of The Post at Chase Park Plaza Theater on Tuesday, Feb. 6. The location of the post-film discussion has not been decided; please let us know if you have a preference! The Facebook event is here.

Want to know what else is going on in St. Louis journalism? Check out the SPJ newsletter! Awards, job listings, people on the move, upcoming events with SPJ and other St. Louis journalism organizations, and much, much more!


Posted in newsletter, special events | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

Trivia Night this Saturday!

Reserve your table at the SPJ Trivia Night!

Test your skills against smart journalists at one of the area’s most fun trivia nights! Doors open at 6:30 and the competition starts at 7 p.m.

We award media-related merchandise prizes to the top three tables, and the fun includes a silent auction, a book sale, contests and more!

Tickets are $20 per person, or $160 for a table of eight, and include beer, wine and soda. This year we are hosted by the International Institute, 3401 Arsenal St, St. Louis. Access the International Institute’s gym from the parking lot off Louisiana Avenue.

Don’t have a team? Come anyway! We are happy to put together singles teams at the event. You don’t need to gather seven other brilliant minds to enjoy Trivia Night!

Proceeds support SPJ’s scholarship fund and programming, such as our seminars, the Student Boot Camp, First Amendment Free* Food Festival and more. Most of our programming is offered free of charge to all journalists and students, regardless of membership. The Trivia Night is our only major fundraiser throughout the year, and we rely on you to fund these programs! Please help support SPJ’s mission in St. Louis!

For reservations or more information email or call 314-340-8213. Space is limited, so reserve now!

Posted in , fundraising, trivia night | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

St. Louis SPJ condemns arrest of journalist Mike Faulk

The St. Louis Pro Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists condemns the arrest of reporter Mike Faulk by St. Louis police during the weekend’s protests and demonstrations.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch has reported that one of their own, reporter Mike Faulk, was caught in a controversial police tactic known as “kettling” on Sunday night. Faulk was on duty covering the protests and the ensuing police action when police apparently blocked all four sides of the intersection.

According to the Post-Dispatch, Faulk and many others were told “move back,” but literally had nowhere to go. Faulk’s own Twitter feed states that no one knew how they were to disperse. “We are closed in on all four sides now, I have no idea where people are supposed to go,” Faulk posted. “People moving toward bike cops, looks like best option.”

Then there was silence, for more than 13 hours.

Faulk reports he was knocked to the ground and pinned by a police officer, with a boot literally on his head. Pinned to the ground, motionless, he was then pepper-sprayed in the face. He was arrested, held overnight in jail, and has since been charged with “failure to disperse.”

The Post-Dispatch has a photograph of Faulk in the process of being arrested. His press credential is clearly visible. Police officers surround him, and yet he was not released. According to Faulk, he was kept in jail for six hours after his editor posted bail, enough time for his family to email Mayor Lyda Krewson calling for his release.

This is not the first time this problem has arisen in our community. In 2014, we saw multiple journalists threatened and illegally ordered to stop reporting and recording; journalists with firearms aimed at them while doing their jobs in approved areas. In the case of two journalists literally arrested while writing their stories in a McDonald’s, the embarrassment of the charges filed against them and eventually dismissed cast yet another shadow on the reputation of St. Louis. Another journalist arrested during Ferguson filed a civil rights suit with the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri, and won a settlement in 2015.

The ACLU has also spoken up about the mass arrests and police tactics used in the Stockley protests, citing excessive force and unconstitutional arrests.

There can be no question that Mike Faulk was there in his capacity as a journalist. There can be no question that the police officers containing the situation knew that Faulk was a reporter and that he was no threat to them. He should have been safe by approaching police officers in his efforts to leave the scene as ordered. After all, they were there to protect him, were they not?

Journalism is the only profession protected by name in the Constitution. The First Amendment is not a whimsical academic concept to be dismissed when it becomes inconvenient – or embarrassing to the police. The chilling effect of assaulting, arresting, jailing and charging a journalist in the course of his duties cannot be overstated.

Journalists in high-incident situations are already placing themselves in harm’s way to perform the public service of informing the community. They are on the ground surrounded by some who may be hostile toward them, as we also have seen over the last few days. Since his release, Faulk reportedly has been harassed and threatened online.

Journalists already have much to fear in this brave new world. They should not have to fear the police as well.

The St. Louis Society of Professional Journalists calls for the immediate dismissal of charges against Mike Faulk, and for an investigation into the events of this weekend to determine whether officers violated the Constitutional rights of Faulk or any other citizens. Mayor Krewson has promised that any police misconduct would be investigated, and we hope she remains true to her word. A formal, transparent investigation will serve as a reminder to the officers on duty of their responsibilities to the Constitution of the United States as guardians of the public’s safety.

That means journalists, too.


Contact: Elizabeth Donald, president of the St. Louis Society of Professional Journalists

SPJ promotes the free flow of information vital to informing citizens; works to inspire and educate the next generation of journalists; and fights to protect First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and press. Support excellent journalism and fight for your right to know. Become a member, give to the Legal Defense Fund, or give to the Sigma Delta Chi Foundation.


Note: This post has been edited for clarity. -ekd
Posted in advocacy, first amendment, government and media | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off